Abstract
The ability to orient and navigate in space is essential for all animals whose home range is organized around a central point. Because of their small home range compared to vertebrates, central place foraging insects such as ants have for a long time provided a choice model for the study of orientation mechanisms. In many ant species, the movement of individuals on their colony home range is achieved essentially collectively, on the chemical trails laid down by their nest mates. In the initial stage of food recruitment, these trails can cross each other and thus form a network of interconnected paths in which ants have to orient. Previous simulation studies have shown that ants can find the shortest path between their nest and a food source in such a network only if there is a bias in the branch they choose when they reach an asymmetrical bifurcation. In this paper, we studied the choice of ants when facing either a symmetrical or an asymmetrical bifurcation between two tunnels. Ants were tested either on their way to a food source or when coming back to their nest, and either in the presence or in the absence of a chemical trail. Overall, our results show that the choice of an ant at a tunnel bifurcation depends more on the presence/absence of a trail pheromone than on the geometry of the bifurcation itself.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aron S, Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (1989) Trail-laying behaviour during exploratory recruitment in the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr). Biol Behav 14:207–217
Aron S, Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1993) Memory and chemical communication in the orientation of two mass-recruiting ant species. Insect Soc 39:351–364. doi:10.1007/BF01253900
Banks AN, Srygley RB (2003) Orientation by magnetic field in leaf-cutter ants, Atta colombica (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ethology 109:835–846. doi:10.1046/j.0179-1613.2003.00927.x
Beckers R, Goss S, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1989) Colony size, communication and ant foraging strategy. Psyche 96: 239–256. http://psyche2.entclub.org/articles/96/96-239.pdf
Bhatkar AP, Whitcomb WH (1970) Artificial diet for rearing various species of ants. Fla Entomol 53:229–232
Bisch-Knaden S, Wehner R (2001) Egocentric information helps desert ants to navigate around familiar obstacles. J Exp Biol 204:4177–4184
Camlitepe Y, Stradling DJ (1995) Wood ants orient to magnetic fields. Proc R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci 261:37–41. doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0114
Deneubourg JL, Aron S, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the Argentine ant. J Insect Behav 3:159–168. doi:10.1007/BF01417909
Dussutour A, Deneubourg JL, Fourcassié V (2005) Amplification of individual preferences in a social context: the case of wall-following in ants. Proc R Soc London Ser B Biol Sci 272:705–714. doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.2990
Fourcassié V, Deneubourg JL (1994) The dynamics of collective exploration and trail-formation in Monomorium pharaonis: experiments and model. Physiol Entomol 19:291–300
Giraud T, Pedersen JS, Keller L (2002) Evolution of supercolonies: the Argentine ants of southern Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:6075–6079. doi:10.1073/pnas.092694199
Gotwald WHJ (1995) Army ants—the biology of social predation. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Hölldobler B, Möglich M (1980) The foraging system of Pheidole militicida. Insect Soc 27:237–264. doi:10.1007/BF02223667
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Springer, Berlin
Jackson DE, Holcombe M, Ratnieks FLW (2004) Trail geometry gives polarity to ant foraging networks. Nature 432:907–909. doi:10.1038/nature03105
Jander R, Jander U (1998) The light and magnetic compass of the weaver ant, Oecophylla smaragdina (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 104:743–758. doi:10.1046/j.0179–1613.2003.00927.x
Kost C, Game de Oliveira E, Knoch TA, Wirth R (2005) Spatio-temporal permanence of plasticity of foraging trails in young and mature leaf-cutting ant colonies (Atta spp.). J trop Ecol 21:677–688. doi:10.1017/S0266467405002592
Manly BFJ (1991) Randomization and Monte Carlo methods in biology. Chapman & Hall, New York
Müller M, Wehner R (2007) Wind and sky as compass cues in desert ant navigation. Naturwissenschaften, 94:589–594. doi:10.1007/s00114-007-0232-4
Traniello JFA (1989) Foraging strategies of ants. Annu Rev Entomol 34:191–210
Tsutsui ND, Suarez AV, Holway DA, Case TJ (2000) Reduced genetic variation and the success of an invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:5948–5953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.100110397
Vasconcelos HL (1990) Foraging activity of two species of leaf-cutting ants (Atta) in a primary forest of the Central Amazon. Insect Soc 37:131–145. doi:10.1007/BF02224026
Vittori K, Talbot G, Gautrais J, Fourcassie V, Araujo AFR, Theraulaz G (2006) Path efficiency of ant foraging trails in an artificial network. J Theoret Biol 239:507–515. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.08.017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gerbier, G., Garnier, S., Rieu, C. et al. Are ants sensitive to the geometry of tunnel bifurcation?. Anim Cogn 11, 637–642 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0153-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-008-0153-4